Loading…
Friday, November 28, 2014
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
HomeA&EBooks
Published: Sunday, 10/21/2012

History of dictionary is surprisingly entertaining

BY ANN LEVIN
ASSOCIATED PRESS
The Story of Ain't: America, Its language, and the Most Controversial Dictionary ever Published, by David Skinner (Harper, 368 pages, $27) The Story of Ain't: America, Its language, and the Most Controversial Dictionary ever Published, by David Skinner (Harper, 368 pages, $27)
Enlarge

David Skin­ner’s The Story of Ain’t is an im­mensely en­ter­tain­ing his­tory of a dic­tio­nary whose ap­pear­ance in 1961 sent crit­ics over the edge. “Lit­er­ary an­ar­chy,” "sab­o­tage,” "di­sas­ter,” "ca­lam­ity” — these were just a few of the ep­i­thets hurled at Web­ster’s Third New In­ter­na­tional Dic­tio­n­ary. More than half a cen­tury later, it may be hard to un­der­stand how mere printed mat­ter could get folks so worked up. But Skin­ner, the ed­i­tor of Human­i­ties mag­a­zine, man­ages to trans­form this some­what ar­cane lex­i­co­graph­i­cal dis­pute into a real page turner.

The story be­gins in 1934 with a black-tie din­ner cel­e­brat­ing the pub­li­ca­tion of Web­ster’s Second, a 17-pound tome crammed with all the in­for­ma­tion a well-bred per­son of that time might need to know. Oddly, that in­cluded lists of dog breeds and bi­og­ra­phies of Roman or­a­tors.

By 1961, of course, that wasn’t nearly enough. The coun­try had en­dured a de­pres­sion and world war and wit­nessed the rise of tele­vi­sion and mov­ies, the aero­space in­dus­try, in­ter­state high­way sys­tem, civil rights move­ment, baby boom gen­er­a­tion, rock ‘n’ roll, and more.

That meant lots of new words had to be in the up­dated edi­tion, in­clud­ing bal­lis­tic mis­sile, de­seg­re­ga­tion, hous­ing de­vel­op­ment, Lit­tle League, McCarthy­ism, po­ny­tail, and Zen. And when it came to us­age, Web­ster’s Third wasn’t con­tent to only quote from the likes of Dryden and Shake­speare — in came pithy snip­pets from movie stars, Mickey Spil­l­ane, even a for­mer madam.

To make room for the new, Edi­tor-in-Chief Phi­lip Gove de­cided that a good chunk of the old had to go, in­clud­ing en­cy­clo­pe­dic ma­terial that ar­gu­ably didn’t be­long there in the first place.

What proved most con­tro­ver­sial, how­ever, was his over­arch­ing ed­i­to­rial phi­los­o­phy that the best a dic­tio­nary could do was to faith­fully record the lan­guage as it was spo­ken.

 If that meant ig­nor­ing the some­times ar­chaic, elit­ist, and mor­al­iz­ing pre­scrip­tions of the gram­mar cops, well then, so be it.

Gove’s po­si­tion, re­flect­ing de­cades of well-es­tab­lished lin­guis­tic re­search, out­raged the so-called pre­scrip­tiv­ists, who thought Web­ster’s Third rep­re­sented per­mis­sive­ness run amok.

Skin­ner ably and amus­ingly cap­tures the hys­ter­i­cal tone of the bit­ter pub­lic quar­rel while sug­gest­ing that it fore­shad­owed many of the ar­gu­ments over val­ues and stan­dards that we’re still fight­ing about to­day.



Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.