Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor laid out an eight-point plan for strengthening judicial elections, including instituting nonpartisan primaries, at the Ohio State Bar Association's annual meeting.
COLUMBUS — Should Ohio judicial elections go entirely non-partisan on the ballot?
Should Ohio switch to some non-partisan process to help governors fill judicial vacancies, and should those appointments require state Senate confirmation?
In a Cleveland appearance Thursday before the Ohio State Bar Association, Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor put eight topics on the table for discussion that she hopes will lead to a judicial election reform proposal by year’s end.
The plan skirts the political hot-potato of replacing elections with a form of merit appointment process.
“Over the last 75 years, there have been opportunities to switch to a merit selection, which would require a constitutional amendment, but time and again voters have reaffirmed by large margins, 2 to 1, that they want judges to be accountable in competitive elections…,” she said. “So, I believe it is time to move on from judicial selection and talk about what we can do to strengthen our existing system of judicial elections.”
The topics also don’t touch on the controversies over the influence of campaign cash in judicial elections. Both issues were being explored by the chief justice’s veteran predecessor, Thomas Moyer, at the time of his death in 2010.
Justice O’Connor, a Republican, goes in the opposite direction from where Democrats want to go when it comes to partisan labels on the ballot. Currently, judges in Ohio run in partisan primaries but run without party labels in the general election.
Democrats have a court case pending in which it seeks to have political labels added to the general election ballot, but Chief Justice O’Connor instead asked whether the primary label should also be removed.
“Some scholars and other observers have argued that party affiliation is a valuable cue to voters, particularly in low-information races like judicial races,” Chief Justice O’Connor said. “They advocate taking the opposite approach and adding partisan labels to judge races in the general election.”
She garnered applause when she added, “I respectfully disagree. Party affiliation has no place in judicial elections. Period.”
Ohio Democratic Party Chairman Chris Redfern questioned whether a non-partisan primary election could lead to multiple candidates of the same party running in the general election.
“I have advocated party labels in the general election,” he said. “Providing as much information as possible is better than providing no information. In all due respect to the chief justice, the bar association and the judicial conference have taken positions on core issues in the past, and those positions have jaundiced their position to speak fairly and with a non-partisan lens.”
Still, he said he is willing to engage in the discussion.
Other questions that Chief Justice O’Connor proposed included:
- —Should Ohio stop placing judicial races at the bottom of the ballot, a move that leads to a huge drop-off in voter participation?
- —Should judicial elections be held in odd-numbered years so they might get more attention?
- —Should Ohio increase the minimum qualifications required to serve as judge?
- —Should the length of judicial terms be increased?
- —Should Ohio expand its civic education, create a judicial voter guide, and expand use of cameras in courtrooms beyond the state Supreme Court?
“This is just an opportunity to start the discussion,” Chief Justice O’Connor said. She urged participation in the process by going to www.OhioCourts2013.org.
Contact Jim Provance at: firstname.lastname@example.org or 614-221-0496.