People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals has been the scourge of those it considers contemptuous of animal rights. Because of its fierce, attention-getting advocacy, PETA has claimed moral pre-eminence among pro-animal groups.
But a New York Times report on PETA’s refusal to adopt a “no-kill” shelter model has tarnished its image. The story said the PETA animal shelter in Norfolk, Va., kills an average of 2,000 dogs and cats a year. This is at a time when animal adoptions are up dramatically at non-PETA shelters that have no-kill policies.
The PETA facility placed only 19 animals in adoptions in 2012, and only 24 in 2011. It euthanized most of the animals it has made a duty to protect.
PETA says that no-kill shelters warehouse animals for years in cages, and that other animals are so injured or sick that euthanasia is the most humane option. But no-kill shelters still strive to place animals with welcoming households. PETA should do the same.
As word spreads about PETA’s widespread use of euthanasia, the animal-rights group itself could become the subject of protests. If PETA cannot commit to the no-kill philosophy practiced by organizations in the pro-animal community, it will forfeit the moral right to speak out about others’ inhumane actions.
Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. Comments that violate these standards, or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, are subject to being removed and commenters are subject to being banned. To post comments, you must be a registered user on toledoblade.com. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.