Loading…
Thursday, July 10, 2014
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
Published: Sunday, 7/28/2013

Letters to the Editor

Commentary shows prejudice

You stooped to a new low with the July 23 commentary by Blade associate editor Keith Burris, “Lopez’s negatives mounting.” I have lived in Toledo for more than 40 years, and I have never heard of Mr. Burris or know of any of his accomplishments, other than that he can mow his lawn.

His commentary on the front page of the Second News section continues your attack on Lucas County Auditor Anita Lopez’s campaign for mayor of Toledo.

Ms. Lopez, through hard work, has straightened out the mess at the auditor’s office. The raises she gave to the workers in her office were nowhere near the amount of the raises given to Mayor Mike Bell’s lackeys.

You again show your prejudice against women, single women, and people of Hispanic origin.

GARY BUCK

Scottwood Avenue


Click here to submit a letter to the editor.


Lopez should go after scofflaws

Ms. Lopez is so quick to criticize our city government. Why doesn’t she start by cleaning up her own department?

BARBARA HALASZ

Valentine Street


Highway cameras of little benefit

In addition to concerns about Big Brother spying on us, brought up in the July 12 Readers’ Forum letter “Highway cameras invoke spying,” I have another concern: cost versus benefit.

An Ohio Department of Transportation spokesman said the cameras in the freeway management system help with traffic flow. This project took place without any public scrutiny that I know of.

If the cameras could detect a wrong-way driver and save a few lives, there may be a benefit. But simply monitoring traffic does not seem to provide any substantial benefit.

The money spent on these cameras could have been better spent repairing roads and bridges. This is just one more example of out-of-control government spending.

BRENDAN BUCKLEY

Orchard Trail Drive

 

Rebuild, not move, Rt. 64 span

The option of relocating the State Rt. 64 bridge in Waterville to a site at the foot of Farnsworth Road is a poor choice (“State scouts project sites in Waterville area,” July 15).

This part of Waterville is a designated historic district. It has many homes that were built before 1900, including mine, in 1854, and the 1828 Columbian House. The historic nature of Waterville would be jeopardized by the intrusion of Route 64 and the accompanying bridge.

The Waterville Historical Society conducts tours of the historic district for the public, including groups of schoolchildren. The society prides itself on preserving this part of Waterville and its history. A state route and bridge at the Farnsworth Road location would bisect the historic district and interfere with the tours.

Closing the existing Route 64 bridge and building a replacement at the same site would inconvenience some motorists for a couple of years. But it would be a small price to pay for preserving Waterville’s history for future generations.

FLORENCE WHEELDEN

Waterville

 

Detroit provides Toledo a lesson

Your July 23 editorial “Rebirth of Detroit” was great. We need to heed what has happened to Detroit and try to not let it happen to Toledo.

JEANETTE CEGLIO

Strauss Avenue



Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.

Related stories