Michigan Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville and Senate Minority Leader Gretchen Whitmer talk as the state Senate considers Medicaid legislation.
DETROIT NEWS Enlarge
LANSING — The Michigan Senate’s intense, months-long debate over Medicaid expansion and the federal health care law is not over, even after the Republican-controlled chamber’s milestone vote to provide health insurance to hundreds of thousands of low-income residents.
Senators on Tuesday will reconsider the issue of when the legislation should take effect.
While the Senate passed the bill 20-18 in dramatic fashion, it fell short of the votes needed to go into immediate effect.
For an estimated 320,000 newly eligible adults counting on the medical coverage next year, it means waiting until late March or early April instead of Jan. 1.
It also could cost the state — which is taking the U.S. government’s offer to pay the entire cost of expansion for the first three years — $64 million in savings primarily associated with paying mental health and substance abuse treatment costs with federal dollars.
Gov. Rick Snyder, for whom Medicaid expansion is a major legislative priority, said he hopes that when the “dust all settles” after last Tuesday’s vote, more Republicans will agree to let the bill go into effect in January even if they voted against the measure itself.
Four Republicans of the 18 voting “no” did that.
“Should we make people wait three more months for the opportunity to get this coverage? I’m not sure the benefit of the three-month wait,” Mr. Snyder said.
Since winning a supermajority in 2010, Senate Republicans typically have been united in letting proposed laws have effect immediately when such votes are held. The votes are seen as “procedural” and a chance to stick together when passing bills along party lines over Democrats’ objections.
Every GOP senator agreed in December to put contentious emergency manager legislation into law immediately even though some Republicans voted against the bill. The law ultimately took effect in March because the House did not grant it immediate effect.
But implementing a key component of “Obamacare” — even after various GOP provisions were attached that, in Mr. Snyder’s words, make Michigan’s plan “not generic Medicaid expansion” — is a different animal.
It is staunchly opposed by most Senate Republicans, some in shock that the bill won passage in a GOP-dominated chamber.
By taking any action seen as aiding implementation of the Affordable Care Act, they could face repercussions in 2014 primary elections or later in their political careers. Challengers can try to portray lawmakers’ procedural vote as voting for or against the issue.
“We believe it’s such an onerous law that we need to fight it every step of the way. The instinct of those senators that didn’t vote for immediate effect was the correct one. We’d urge those 14 to continue to stand strong,” said Scott Hagerstrom, state director for the conservative group Americans for Prosperity.
The Senate has not yet transmitted the Medicaid bill to the Republican-led House, which is waiting to send it to Mr. Snyder on Tuesday. GOP senators could hear from their leadership over the holiday weekend before deciding what to do in a private caucus meeting Tuesday.
“The focus was definitely to get House Bill 4714 up for a vote and through the chamber. We’ll see what next week holds,” said Amber McCann, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville (R., Monroe).
Even if lawmakers decide the expansion should go on the books right away, Michigan’s ability to extend coverage on day one may still be in doubt.
Michigan’s approach is different than many other states accepting the Medicaid expansion made optional by a Supreme Court ruling.
It includes GOP requirements that nondisabled enrollees making 100 to 133 percent of the poverty line pay up to 5 percent of their income on medical expenses after six months. They would have to contribute up to 7 percent after getting Medicaid for four years or shop for insurance from a new marketplace where they could qualify for federal tax credits.
The initial cost-sharing provisions — along with financial incentives to lead healthy lifestyles and a plan to create individual health savings accounts — need federal approval more quickly.
Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. Comments that violate these standards, or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, are subject to being removed and commenters are subject to being banned. To post comments, you must be a registered user on toledoblade.com. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.