GENEVA — The United States has scored a victory before the World Trade Organization in a case that challenged China’s imposition of penalty tariffs on the sale of $5 billion in U.S.-made vehicles in China.
A WTO panel ruled today that China’s tariffs violated international trade rules. The ruling came during a week when the U.S. Justice Department charged five Chinese military officers with hacking into U.S. companies’ computer systems to steal trade secrets.
The two developments pointed to intensifying trade tensions between the world’s two biggest economies.
The dispute panel for the Geneva-based WTO sided with the United States in its ruling. It said China had acted “inconsistently” in imposing the anti-dumping requirements in violation of its WTO commitments.
U.S. officials said China withdrew the higher tariffs in December in response to indications that it would lose the WTO case. Officials said they pushed forward with the case to establish the precedent that China’s actions violated global trade rules.
The WTO allows countries to raise import duties to offset improper subsidies and dumping. But the complaint the Obama administration filed in 2012 accused Beijing of improperly imposing the anti-dumping duties.
The administration contended that China’s tariffs were imposed in retaliation for penalty tariffs the administration had levied on Chinese-made tires.
China had defended the duties on U.S.-made vehicles as legal under international rules. It asserted that the administration’s bailouts of General Motors Corp. and Chrysler amounted to unfair government subsidies. China’s duties affected cars and sport-utility vehicles with engine capacities of 2.5 liters or larger.
U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman said the WTO ruling would benefit America’s nearly 850,000 auto workers. China has become America’s second-largest auto export market. In 2013, the United States exported $64.9 billion of autos, with $8.5 billion of that total going to China.
Froman said the penalty duties, ranging up to 21.5 percent, hit $5.1 billion of America’s auto exports to China last year. The penalties covered such popular models as the Jeep Grand Cherokee, the Cadillac Escalade and the Buick Enclave.
“This is the third time that the United States has prevailed in a WTO dispute challenging China’s unjustified trade remedies,” Froman told reporters in Washington.
The two other disputes involved U.S. specialty steel products and chicken broiler parts.
The Obama administration has been more aggressive in filing WTO cases against China than the Bush administration was and has stepped up pressure in other areas of trade. The U.S. trade gap with China, which is at a record high, is its largest with any country.
Besides this week’s indictment of five Chinese officials on hacking charges, Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew flew to Beijing last week for talks that covered U.S. concerns that China’s currency has been falling in value this year. American manufacturers contend that China’s renminbi is as much as 40 percent undervalued against the dollar, giving Chinese companies an unfair trade advantage.
Rep. Sander Levin, D-Michigan, said today’s ruling was a “significant victory in the fight against China’s practice of retaliating and intimidating those who dare to stand up to it.”
Still pending before the WTO is a second auto case the United States filed in 2012. It challenges export subsidies that China provides for its own car and auto parts manufacturers.
U.S. officials said discussions with China were still ongoing in that case. Under WTO rules, both countries must try to resolve the trade dispute through negotiations before a WTO panel convenes to hear the case.
Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. Comments that violate these standards, or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, are subject to being removed and commenters are subject to being banned. To post comments, you must be a registered user on toledoblade.com. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.