Loading…
Friday, April 18, 2014
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
HomeSportsBGSU
Published: 11/7/2013 - Updated: 5 months ago

COLLEGE FOOTBALL

End Zone: BGSU Falcons

The targeting rule is a no-win situation for officials

BY JOHN WAGNER
BLADE SPORTS WRITER

Let's be clear here: I am in favor of player safety in college football. But Rule 9-1-4 – the "targeting" rule – is a bad rule that doesn't even accomplish that goal.

The targeting rule is a no-win situation for officials, who are forced to make bang-bang judgments on high-speed plays, and at times results in the ejection of a player who doesn't deserve it (need I say "Bradley Roby," OSU fans?).

Worse are plays where the player appears to break that rule and isn't penalized. Take, for example, the Toledo-BG game, when Falcons QB Matt Johnson seems destined for the end zone, only to be spun around on a huge hit by UT's Ethan Kagy.

It was a great hit. It was a game-changing hit, because it kept Johnson out of the end zone, and BG eventually was forced to kick a field goal. It also seems to be illegal because Kagy led with the crown of his helmet.

Disagree? That's fine, because it points to a bigger problem: Remember Johnson groggily getting up after the hit? If that play IS legal, it didn't do anything to make Johnson safe.

The word is Rule 9-1-4 will be reviewed after the season. Hopefully in this case "reviewed" is code for "eliminated."

Contact John Wagner at: jwagner@theblade.com, 419-724-6481 or on Twitter @jwagnerblade.



Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.

Related stories