Let's be clear here: I am in favor of player safety in college football. But Rule 9-1-4 – the "targeting" rule – is a bad rule that doesn't even accomplish that goal.
The targeting rule is a no-win situation for officials, who are forced to make bang-bang judgments on high-speed plays, and at times results in the ejection of a player who doesn't deserve it (need I say "Bradley Roby," OSU fans?).
Worse are plays where the player appears to break that rule and isn't penalized. Take, for example, the Toledo-BG game, when Falcons QB Matt Johnson seems destined for the end zone, only to be spun around on a huge hit by UT's Ethan Kagy.
It was a great hit. It was a game-changing hit, because it kept Johnson out of the end zone, and BG eventually was forced to kick a field goal. It also seems to be illegal because Kagy led with the crown of his helmet.
Disagree? That's fine, because it points to a bigger problem: Remember Johnson groggily getting up after the hit? If that play IS legal, it didn't do anything to make Johnson safe.
The word is Rule 9-1-4 will be reviewed after the season. Hopefully in this case "reviewed" is code for "eliminated."
Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. Comments that violate these standards, or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, are subject to being removed and commenters are subject to being banned. To post comments, you must be a registered user on toledoblade.com. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.