Loading…
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
HomeNewsCourts
Published: Saturday, 4/5/2014 - Updated: 3 months ago

FEDERAL COURT

Days limited for same-sex unions ban

Judge to strike down portion of Ohio’s law

BLADE STAFF AND NEWS SERVICES
Attorney Al Gerhardstein, left, stands with several same-sex couples at a news conference Friday in Cincinnati. Mr. Gerhardstein said ‘this [gay marriage ban] is a serious problem at the basic level of human dignity.’ Attorney Al Gerhardstein, left, stands with several same-sex couples at a news conference Friday in Cincinnati. Mr. Gerhardstein said ‘this [gay marriage ban] is a serious problem at the basic level of human dignity.’
ASSOCIATED PRESS Enlarge

CINCINNATI — A federal judge said Friday that he will order Ohio to recognize out-of-state gay marriages, a move that would strike down part of the state’s ban on gay marriages but stop short of forcing it to perform same-sex weddings.

Judge Timothy Black announced his intentions in federal court in Cincinnati following final arguments in a lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of the marriage ban.

“I intend to issue a declaration that Ohio’s recognition bans, that have been relied upon to deny legal recognition to same-sex couples validly entered in other states where legal, violates the rights secured by the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,” Judge Black said. “[They’re] denied their fundamental right to marry a person of their choosing and the right to remain married.”

Judge Black said he’ll issue the ruling April 14. The civil rights attorneys who filed the February lawsuit did not ask Judge Black to order the state to perform gay marriages, and he did not say he would do so.

Gay marriage is legal in 17 states and the District of Columbia. Federal judges also have struck down bans in Michigan, Utah, Texas, Oklahoma, and Virginia, and ordered Kentucky and Tennessee to recognize out-of-state gay marriages, though stays have been issued pending appeals.

Pam and Nicole Yorksmith, a Cincinnati couple who married in California in 2008 and have a 3-year-old son, were among the four couples who filed the lawsuit challenging the gay marriage ban and said Judge Black’s comments Friday gave them validation.

“It also validates to our kids that we’re bringing into our marriage that their parents are recognized by the state that we live in, and that’s extremely important,” Pam Yorksmith said. “We’re teaching kids of future generations that all families are different and just because our family doesn’t look like your family doesn’t mean that ours shouldn’t be recognized.”

Nicole Yorksmith is pregnant through artificial insemination with the couple’s second child and is due in June.

The Cincinnati-based legal team asked Judge Black to declare that Ohio’s gay marriage ban is “facially unconstitutional, invalid, and unenforceable,” and indicated that following such a ruling, the window would be open for additional litigation seeking to force the state to allow gay couples to marry in Ohio.

Federal Judge Timothy Black said Friday he will strike down part of Ohio’s voter-approved ban on gay marriage. Federal Judge Timothy Black said Friday he will strike down part of Ohio’s voter-approved ban on gay marriage.
CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION Enlarge

“This is a serious problem at the basic level of human dignity,” civil rights attorney Al Gerhardstein told Judge Black during Friday’s arguments. “That human dignity is denied by the way Ohio treats same-sex couples. This is central to our whole commitment as a nation to equality.”

Dan Tierney, a spokesman for Ohio’s attorney general, said the state will appeal Judge Black’s order when it comes out but declined to comment further.

Attorneys for the state argued that it’s Ohio’s sole province to define marriage as between a man and a woman, that the statewide gay marriage ban doesn’t violate any fundamental rights, and that attorneys improperly expanded their originally narrow lawsuit.

“Ohio has made its own decision regarding marriage, deciding to preserve the traditional definition,” state’s attorneys argued in court filings ahead of Friday’s hearing. They argued that striking down the law would “disregard the will of Ohio voters, and undercut the democratic process.”

Judge Black didn’t say why he made the announcement on his ruling before he issues it. But by stating his intention ahead of his ruling, Judge Black gave time for the state to prepare an appeal that can be filed as soon as he does. The state also can work on asking Judge Black for a stay in his ruling pending appeal.

David Mann, a lawyer and local spokesman for Equality Toledo, said his members welcome the judge’s statement, and hope that his ruling is upheld by the U.S. Appeals Court and Supreme Court.

“Allowing those couples who are already married to have the same rights, benefits, and responsibilities as any other couple is not only the right thing but a common sense thing to do,” Mr. Mann said. “We hope it leads from here to ultimately letting same-sex couples be legally wedded in the state of Ohio.”

Phil Burress, who chaired the 2004 effort to ban same-sex marriage and is the president of Citizens for Community Values, said his group is prepared to fight any ballot initiative to repeal the ban.

He said he’s confident the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and other courts will overturn Judge Black’s coming order and the seven recent rulings overturning statewide gay marriage bans elsewhere or ordering states to recognize out-of-state gay marriages.



Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.

Related stories