WHAT presidents say in their State of the Union addresses sometimes amounts to nothing more than applause lines. But President Obama's endorsement of nuclear power before Congress in late January was confirmed last month - and that's good news for the nation.
In Lanham, Md., before a happy audience of union members for whom clean-energy efforts mean new jobs, Mr. Obama announced that the U.S. Department of Energy had conditionally approved $8.3 billion in loan guarantees for nuclear plant construction.
Southern Co. plans to build two advanced reactors at the Plant Vogtle power station in eastern Georgia. When the company receives its construction and operating license, this will be the first nuclear plant built in the United States since the 1970s. The Nuclear Energy Institute, an industry group, hailed the announcement as a milestone.
All of this will give some environmentalists heartburn - especially as Southern Co., which also has fossil fuel-burning plants, has lobbied strongly against climate-change legislation in Congress. But there's a bigger picture to consider. Environmentalists should ask themselves what is the greatest threat facing the planet today. If their answer is climate change, they need to rethink their position and move beyond one company's unhelpful behavior.
The United States has 104 nuclear power plants. Operating under stringent federal safety requirements, they reliably provide about a fifth of the nation's electricity, and do it without producing greenhouse gases.
In supporting nuclear power, the Obama Administration is not slighting other forms of clean energy, such as solar and wind power. It is recognizing that nuclear energy has an important role to play. Indeed, nuclear energy is less problematic than opening up new offshore areas for oil and gas exploration - which the President also mentioned in his State of the Union address and again two weeks ago.
Unfortunately, the administration hasn't followed the logic of its own policy. It had previously pulled the plug on Nevada's Yucca Mountain as a final depository of nuclear waste, which will continue to pile up at individual plants. Eventually, something will have to be done, but for the moment the Not in My Back Yard imperative rules.
If the United States is going to get serious about climate change, it must also get serious about nuclear power.
Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. Comments that violate these standards, or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, are subject to being removed and commenters are subject to being banned. To post comments, you must be a registered user on toledoblade.com. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.