Loading…
Friday, August 22, 2014
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
Published: Thursday, 3/1/2012

GUEST EDITORIAL

Save Afghan strategy

The latest crisis in Afghanistan strikes at the heart of the U.S. strategy for preventing the country from reverting to Taliban rule or becoming a base for al-Qaeda.

If those goals are to be achieved, the Afghan security forces that have been recruited, trained, and equipped at enormous cost over the past several years must be sustained. That will require continued training and advising by NATO, and heavy outside funding, for many years to come.

That prospect seemed to be endangered last week, when four U.S. soldiers were killed by Afghans in uniform. After an attack inside the interior ministry in Kabul, U.S. and NATO advisers were withdrawn from all ministries.

Fortunately, Pentagon and White House officials describe the move as temporary. They say the Obama Administration and NATO remain committed to the underlying strategy.

Yet the episode seems likely to strengthen those in and outside the administration who seek to accelerate the drawdown of U.S. troops next year and slash funding for Afghan forces. While such steps may appeal to voters in an election year, they would only compound the challenges that face the Afghan mission.

The probable trigger for the latest attacks on U.S. soldiers was the mistaken but inexcusable burning of Qur'ans at the U.S. air base in Bagram, an incident for which President Obama rightly apologized. Republican presidential candidates were foolish to criticize Mr. Obama's gesture, which prompted Afghan President Hamid Karzai to call for an end to violent anti-American demonstrations.

Afghan security forces suffered their own casualties while defending U.S. installations and personnel. Afghan forces elsewhere in the country continue to carry out joint operations with U.S. troops.

The popular backlash in Afghanistan reflects deeper problems. There is understandable weariness with foreign troops after more than a decade of inconclusive war, resentment at the death of civilians in NATO operations, and frustration with the corruption and fecklessness of the U.S.-backed government.

The Obama Administration's poor handling of Mr. Karzai has magnified these problems. Its setting of politically motivated timetables for troop withdrawals and aggressive pursuit of negotiations with the Taliban has convinced many Afghans that the United States is preparing to abandon the country.

The only secure and honorable means of exit is to finish the work of creating an Afghan army and police force capable of defending the country from the Taliban and other extremists, with backup from U.S. special forces and air power.

Achieving that goal by the end of 2014, the current NATO timetable, will be hard enough, as the events of the past week vividly show. If the Obama Administration chooses to accelerate the timetable or reduce significantly the funding -- and thus the size -- of Afghan forces, it will become nearly impossible.

-- Washington Post



Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.