Loading…
Thursday, April 17, 2014
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
Published: 10/9/2013 - Updated: 6 months ago

GUEST EDITORIAL

Disaster ahead

Consequences abound from congressional failure to raise the U.S. debt ceiling from $16.7 trillion

WASHINGTON POST

No one can specify with certainty the consequences of a congressional failure to raise the U.S. debt ceiling from $16.7 trillion. But it is safe to say that it would not “bring stability to the world markets,” as Rep. Ted Yoho (R., Fla.) incomprehensibly suggested last week.

Contrary to that complacent view — apparently shared to varying degrees by some of Mr. Yoho’s ultra-right Republican colleagues — not extending the U.S. government’s legal authority to borrow would produce turmoil around the globe, forcing up interest rates, crunching credit, closing businesses, and possibly collapsing banks.

The International Monetary Fund calls the prospect “potentially catastrophic.” Goldman Sachs forecasts a “rapid downturn in economic activity.”

The notion that the Treasury Department could “prioritize” debt payments and Social Security out of current tax revenues is phony too. Even if that were technically feasible, it would force cessation of all other expenditures — which would be recession-inducing.

The slightest scratch in what has been bulletproof creditworthiness would shake investor confidence. Every financial institution in the world either does or could hold U.S. Treasury debt in its reserves on the assumption that it is ultra-safe. Undermining that assumption would undermine those institutions.

It’s worth dwelling on that last point: By now, it’s a cliché to refer to U.S. debt as a “highly liquid” or “risk-free” asset. But these are not technical attributes of gilt-edged paper printed in the United States, much less magical qualities. Nor do investors pay a premium for this debt out of deference to our military might, eagerness to trade in our market, or even faith in our rule of law.

What gives people confidence in U.S. debt is all of the above, plus our rock-solid governability. Alone among the world’s governments, the United States — not China, not Brazil, not Canada, not any other nation — has both the need to borrow vast sums of money for long periods and a political system stable enough to convince lenders that their principal will be safe with us until they come to get it back.

The shenanigans in Washington, for which the GOP bears primary responsibility, are not dangerous because they threaten perceived U.S. political stability. They are dangerous because they threaten actual U.S. political stability.

Rep. John Fleming (R., La.) calls Obamacare “the most existential threat to our economy” since the Great Depression. That’s a good description of default.

The federal debt is a burden that we have managed less than optimally; the GOP has a point about that. Yet it is also a blessing because many people, in this country and abroad, are willing to finance that borrowing at moderate interest rates, enabling us to spend more and tax less than we could otherwise.

Americans benefit mightily from the depth and liquidity of our capital market. That rests in turn on the unquestioned status of U.S. repayment.

Much has been said about the embarrassing fact that the United States owes the central bank of China more than $1 trillion. When you think it through, China’s acceptance of our full faith and credit is an enormous compliment.

It is a financial endorsement that implicitly contradicts Beijing’s claims that its Communist market system is superior to ours. For now, it’s a compliment we deserve. But for how much longer?



Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.

Related stories