Loading…
Wednesday, July 30, 2014
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
Published: Saturday, 7/6/2013 - Updated: 1 year ago

MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT

Right-to-work law won’t get an early ruling

ASSOCIATED PRESS

LANSING — The Michigan Supreme Court on Friday unanimously decided not to step in early to decide the legality of the state’s right-to-work law.

The court said it wasn’t persuaded that ruling now would be an “appropriate exercise” of its discretion — despite a request for a special advisory opinion from Republican Gov. Rick Snyder in January.

Since Mr. Snyder’s request, three lawsuits challenging the contentious law have been filed in state and federal courts.

The law prohibits forcing public and private workers to pay union dues or fees as a condition of employment.

Mr. Snyder wanted the justices to especially decide whether the law applies to roughly 35,000 state employees who belong to unions and are under the authority of the Michigan Civil Service Commission.

Contracts expire later this year.

“We’re confident that the constitutionality and legality of the freedom to work laws will be upheld in the courts,” Snyder spokesman Sara Wurfel said.

“The goal in making this request to the Michigan Supreme Court was to bring that clarity to this public policy as quickly as possible and avoid protracted litigation. We respect the Supreme Court’s decision and will continue to defend the freedom to work laws in the lower courts.”

A separate union-led suit on whether the law applies to state employees is pending in the Michigan Court of Appeals.

An Ingham County judge is considering an “uphill” challenge — his words — that contends the law should be invalidated because demonstrators were locked out of the Capitol for hours while the measure was debated.

And a federal judge in Detroit is overseeing a suit that argues the law shouldn’t apply to private-sector workers because federal labor law regulates their rights.

Justice Stephen Markman, who had previously wanted to issue an advisory opinion, agreed Friday that one shouldn’t be given now.

He cited a June brief from state Solicitor General John Bursch, who said while the Supreme Court should have intervened immediately at Mr. Snyder’s behest, the issue is likely moot five months later because the state appeals court is expected to rule soon on the law’s effect on state workers.

The right-to-work law passed the Republican-led Legislature in December and took effect in March over the objections of thousands of protesters at the Capitol. It made Michigan the 24th right-to-work state.

In making his request, Mr. Snyder hoped for a ruling before the court’s term concluded at the end of July.



Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.

Related stories