DAMASCUS, Syria — Tense negotiations have begun on a proposed U.N. resolution that would put Syria’s chemical weapons under international control and end a diplomatic stalemate over a deadly suspected poison gas attack, a French official said today.
The plan for Syria to relinquish its chemical weapons, initiated by Russia, appeared to ease the crisis over looming Western strikes against President Bashar Assad’s regime in Damascus, only to open up new potential for impasse as Moscow rejected U.S. and French demands for a binding U.N. resolution with “very severe consequences” for non-compliance.
In Damascus, a senior government official said the Russian proposal is still a “broad headline” that needs to be developed. He added that Syria was ready to sign the chemical weapons convention but not if such a move is imposed by foreign powers.
Cabinet Minister Ali Haidar told The Associated Press that Syria’s chemical weapons, which he described as “the nuclear of the poor,” were meant to achieve strategic balance against Israel, “an enemy that we’ve been fighting for more than 60 years.”
Now, he said, “a new kind of strategic balance” is in place that allows Syria to relinquish its stockpile as part of an overall plan and “not out of fear of any enemy.” He declined to elaborate.
Asked about the difficulties of implementing the transfer and relinquishment of Syria’s chemical weapons to the backdrop of a raging civil war in the country, he replied: “There was no talk about moving and transferring control. There was talk about putting these weapons under international supervision.”
The French official close to the president, who spoke on condition of anonymity because negotiations remained sensitive, said Russia objected not only to making the resolution militarily enforceable, but also to blaming the alleged Aug. 21 chemical attack on the Syrian government and demanding that those responsible be taken before an international criminal court.
Wary of falling into what the French foreign minister called “a trap,” Paris and Washington are pushing for a U.N. Security Council resolution to verify Syria’s disarmament. Russia, a close ally of Syrian leader Bashar Assad and the regime’s chief patron on the international stage, dismissed France’s proposal on Tuesday.
Alexandre Orlov, Russia’s ambassador to France, did not answer directly when asked today about specific Russian objections.
“We think that the proposal came together quickly, in haste,” Orlov told France Inter radio. “It’s sure there are chemical weapons on both sides. The important thing is to forbid them, put them under international control. Then we will see who uses them.”
The diplomatic maneuvering threatened growing momentum toward a plan that would allow President Barack Obama to back away from military action. Domestic support for a strike is uncertain in the United States, even as Obama seeks congressional backing for action — and there has been little international appetite to join forces against Assad.
In a nationally televised speech Tuesday night, Obama told Americans that diplomacy suddenly holds “the potential to remove the threat of chemical weapons” in Syria without use of force, but he declared that the U.S. military will “be ready to respond” against Assad if other measures fail.
Obama said he had asked congressional leaders to postpone a vote he has been seeking to authorize the use of military force against Syria. The president pledged that any military action wouldn’t involve deploying ground combat troops or waging a prolonged air campaign.
Alexei Pushkov, a Kremlin-connected senior Russian lawmaker, said that Russia could expand arms sales to Iran and revise terms of U.S. military transit to Afghanistan if Washington launches a strike on Syria.
For many in the Syrian opposition who held out hopes that Western strikes against Assad would tip the civil war in the rebellion’s favor, Obama’s decision to seek a diplomatic resolution was a disappointment.
“We believe the regime is just buying more time, is just trying to fool the international community, is just trying to get out of this situation,” said Loay al-Mikdad, spokesman for the Free Syrian Army, a loose-knit alliance of rebel factions that is backed by the West.
“We don’t believe that this delay for any kind of intervention will stop the regime from killing Syrian people or be for the Syrian people’s benefit. It will give Assad more time, and every minute, every day, every hour that passes will cost us more blood and Bashar will continue killing and nothing will change,” he said
But Obama’s decision won the applause of Assad’s close ally Iran, which has provided military and financial support to the Syrian regime since the revolt began in March 2011.
“We hope that the new U.S. attitude toward Syria would be a serious policy and not a media campaign,” Iranian state TV quoted Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as saying. Khamenei has final say on all state matters.
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem told Lebanon’s Al-Mayadeen TV on Tuesday that Syria would place its chemical weapons in the hands of representatives of Russia, other unspecified countries and the United Nations. Syria will also declare the chemical arsenal it long denied having, stop producing such weapons and sign conventions against them.
French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said Tuesday the French resolution would demand that Syria open its chemical weapons program to inspection, place it under international control, and ultimately dismantle it. A violation of that commitment, he said, would carry “very serious consequences.” The resolution would condemn the Aug. 21 attack and bring those responsible to justice, he said.
The prospect of a deal that could be enforced militarily met swift opposition from Russia, which has provided economic, military and diplomatic support to Assad throughout the 2½-year conflict.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said the plan can only work if “the American side and those who support the U.S.A, in this sense, reject the use of force.” Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said it was unacceptable for the resolution to cite Chapter 7, the U.N. resolution authorizing force, his ministry said.
In Geneva, a U.N. commission said today it has confirmed at least eight mass killings perpetrated by Assad’s forces and supporters and one carried out by rebels over the past year and a half.
Calling all of Syria a battlefield where “massacres are perpetrated with impunity,” the U.N. commission said it is probing nine more suspected mass killings since March. Its latest report updates the commission’s work from 2011 until mid-July, stopping short of the Aug. 21 attack.
What has been left unaddressed in the flurry of diplomacy is the broader civil war in Syria, which has already claimed the lives of more than 100,000 people and forced more than 6 million Syrians — nearly a third of the population — to flee their homes.
Heavy between Syrian government troops and rebels flared again today in the ancient, predominantly Christian village of Maaloula, near the Syrian capital. Troops are trying to flush out rebel units, including two that are linked to al-Qaida, from the hilltop enclave which they broke into last week.
Most of the villages 3,300 residents have fled to safer parts of the country, although some have remained and are locked up in their houses, activists said.
Maaloula, about 60 kilometers (40 miles) northeast of Damascus, had until recently been firmly in the regime’s grip despite being surrounded by rebel-held territory. The village was a major tourist attraction before the civil war. Some of its residents still speak a version of Aramaic, a biblical language believed to have been used by Jesus.