Loading…
Friday, September 19, 2014
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
Published: Sunday, 10/28/2012

COMMENTARY

Count on Ohio, and count our votes right

BY DAVID KUSHMA
BLADE EDITOR

Ohioans are poised to pick the next pres­i­dent — just as soon as we make up our col­lec­tive mind how we’re go­ing to vote.

Po­lit­i­cal an­a­lysts, party lead­ers, and poll­sters agree that as the race be­tween Pres­i­dent Obama and Mitt Rom­ney has tight­ened to a vir­tual tie na­tion­wide, barely a week be­fore Elec­tion Day, it’s in­creas­ingly likely that Ohio will con­trib­ute the de­ci­sive vote that pro­vides the tip­ping point in the Elec­toral Col­lege.

“Ohio is cen­tral enough to the elec­toral math that it now seems to mat­ter as much as the other 49 states put to­gether,” Nate Sil­ver, the New York Times’ elec­tion fore­caster, said last week. He told Tole­doans: “I am not sure whether I should be con­grat­u­lat­ing you or con­sol­ing you.”

Bob Ben­nett, the chair­man of the Ohio Re­pub­li­can Party, is even more em­phatic. “Ohio will elect the next pres­i­dent,” he de­clares. He quickly adds: “And it’ll be Rom­ney.”

That last part isn’t so clear. Ac­cord­ing to a poll out to­day, spon­sored by The Blade and the state’s other larg­est news­pa­pers, likely Ohio vot­ers are split right down the mid­dle: 49 per­cent for the Pres­i­dent, 49 per­cent for his Re­pub­li­can chal­lenger. (Our en­dorse­ment of Mr. Obama’s re-elec­tion ap­pears on the ad­ja­cent page.)

So Ohio could well de­ter­mine the out­come of this year’s elec­tion, just as Flor­ida did in 2000 on a ra­zor-thin vote mar­gin. Re­mem­ber those thrill­ing days? But­ter­fly bal­lots, hang­ing chads, and dim­ple dents? A month of law­suits and re­counts? The U.S. Supreme Court — on a 5-4 vote — es­sen­tially nam­ing George W. Bush pres­i­dent over Al Gore?

If the eyes of the na­tion and world are go­ing to fo­cus on our state, we don’t want it to be be­cause of a sim­i­lar fi­asco here. So the state and lo­cal of­fi­cials who run Ohio’s elec­tions need to do ev­ery­thing they can to make the vot­ing ma­chin­ery work flaw­lessly.

That means no screw-ups by the Lu­cas County Board of Elec­tions, in han­dling pro­vi­sional bal­lots or any­thing else. That means the state of­fi­cials who had to be or­dered by the U.S. Supreme Court to open early vot­ing in per­son to all el­i­gi­ble Ohio­ans next Satur­day, Sun­day, and Mon­day don’t al­low any­one to be dis­fran­chised.

That means that the record num­ber of ab­sen­tee bal­lots Ohio­ans are likely to cast this year get counted ef­fi­ciently, and the tally is an­nounced promptly. Ohio Sec­re­tary of State Jon Husted doesn’t want to worry about who will play him in the made-for-HBO movie.

That means no tol­er­ance of self-ap­pointed “poll watch­ers” who try to in­tim­i­date vot­ers. It means no re­prise of Ohio’s elec­toral golden old­ies: long lines of peo­ple still wait­ing to vote at poll clos­ing time, sup­pos­edly state-of-the-art vot­ing and vote-count­ing ma­chines break­ing down, poorly trained elec­tion work­ers di­rect­ing vot­ers to the wrong pre­cinct.

There’s al­ready been a hic­cup: The Ot­tawa County elec­tion board sent an an­nounce­ment to vot­ers in three pre­cincts that not only iden­ti­fied a wrong lo­ca­tion for their poll­ing place but also gave a date for Elec­tion Day that was two days late. Not a fa­tal er­ror, but it had bet­ter not set a trend.

Some ob­serv­ers worry that if the Ohio vote is so close that elec­tion of­fi­cials here can’t de­clare a win­ner un­til they count pro­vi­sional bal­lots, the next pres­i­dent’s iden­tity might re­main un­known un­til af­ter Thanks­giv­ing. Mr. Ben­nett says that’s un­likely; he pre­dicts that Mr. Rom­ney will carry Ohio by a larger mar­gin than cur­rent polls sug­gest, so that the out­come won’t have to turn on pro­vi­sional votes.

In any event, he says he’s con­fi­dent that Ohio won’t be­come this year’s equiv­a­lent of Flor­ida a dozen years ago.

“Com­mon Cause, which is not a con­ser­va­tive or­ga­ni­za­tion, ranked Ohio in the top five [states] in elec­tion laws and vot­ing,” he told me. “And vote fraud is not a big is­sue in Ohio. Does it oc­cur? Maybe a lit­tle bit. Will it make a dif­fer­ence? Prob­a­bly not.”

Two polls re­leased last week — one by Quin­nip­iac Univer­sity for CBS News, the other by Time mag­a­zine — gave Mr. Obama a com­fort­able five-point lead over Mr. Rom­ney in Ohio. But they were the ex­cep­tions. Most other polls place the ad­van­tage for ei­ther the Pres­i­dent or Mr. Rom­ney within the mar­gin of sur­vey er­ror — that is, a toss-up.

The Ohio news­pa­per poll sug­gests that Pres­i­dent Obama en­joys a siz­able ad­van­tage among early vot­ers. That’s not sur­pris­ing; re­search from past elec­tions shows that early-vot­ing Ohio­ans tend to be fe­male, older, poorer, less ed­u­cated, and ur­ban. That gen­er­ally makes them more likely to vote Demo­cratic. Of course, then-Gov. Ted Strick­land won the early vote in 2010 — but ul­ti­mately lost to Re­pub­li­can chal­lenger John Ka­sich.

The GOP cred­its its ground game in Ohio with turn­ing out early vot­ers in num­bers that are ex­ceed­ing the party’s ex­pec­ta­tions. Dem­o­crats say that the other party is bluff­ing and that they are do­ing even bet­ter in early vot­ing than they did four years ago. Take your pick.

Five weeks ago, Mr. Obama had a five-point lead in the Ohio news­pa­per poll; now it’s a dead heat. The new poll sug­gests that Re­pub­li­can vot­ers in our state are more en­thu­si­as­tic about the elec­tion than Dem­o­crats, but that Dem­o­crats are more strongly com­mit­ted to vot­ing.

Ohio­ans pre­fer the Pres­i­dent to make for­eign pol­icy but back Mr. Rom­ney on the econ­omy. Women tend to side with the Pres­i­dent, men with Mr. Rom­ney. Older and bet­ter-ed­u­cated vot­ers tend to sup­port Mr. Rom­ney; African-Amer­i­can vot­ers over­whelm­ingly back Mr. Obama.

The Pres­i­dent’s role in the auto in­dus­try bail­out gives him an edge among in­de­pen­dents, who rep­resent about 10 per­cent of Ohio vot­ers. But such vot­ers also are slightly more likely to think that Mr. Rom­ney won the de­bates.

That is, Ohio vot­ers re­main all over the map. But this year, Ohio is the map.

So make sure you vote, fel­low Ohio­ans. And to the folks who will count the votes: Please get it right.

David Kushma is ed­i­tor of The Blade. Con­tact him at: dkushma@the­blade.com



Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.

Related stories