Sunday, Jun 24, 2018
One of America's Great Newspapers ~ Toledo, Ohio

David Kushma


Pols have had their say — now it’s your turn

The only endorsements that count are the ones you make on your ballot

  • MAP

  • e1Horsey-jpg



The cam­paign is al­most over, and not a day too soon. Another week, and the coun­try might suc­cumb to a col­lec­tive break­down, or at least an ep­i­demic of TV screens with blunt in­stru­ments hurled through them af­ter too many po­lit­i­cal ads.

This as­sumes that we’ll know by Wed­nes­day who the next pres­i­dent will be. The al­ter­na­tive of in­def­i­nite un­cer­tainty — es­pe­cially if it’s cen­tered here in Ohio, as pro­vi­sional bal­lots get counted — is too dis­mal to con­tem­plate.

But how­ever nasty and di­vi­sive the cam­paign has been, you still can’t es­cape your civic duty to vote the whole long bal­lot on Tues­day, if you ha­ven’t al­ready done so (re­mem­ber, you can vote early in per­son to­day and Mon­day). The stakes are clear, as are most of the choices.

Despite the near-ob­ses­sive at­ten­tion lav­ished on the down-to-the-wire pres­i­den­tial con­test, es­pe­cially in Bat­tle­ground Ohio, the race here for the U.S. Senate is also close and nearly as im­por­tant, both to the state and na­tion­ally. Whether Ohio­ans re­hire in­cum­bent Sher­rod Brown or take the chance of re­plac­ing him with chal­lenger Josh Mandel could de­ter­mine which party will con­trol the Senate for the next two years.

The lo­cal elec­tions for the U.S. House, in the re­drawn 5th and 9th dis­tricts, aren’t likely to be nearly as com­pet­i­tive as the pres­i­den­tial and Senate races. But they fea­ture well-known in­cum­bents — Bob Latta and Marcy Kap­tur, re­spec­tively — and in­trigu­ing chal­leng­ers — An­gela Zim­mann and Samuel (Joe the Plum­ber) Wurzel­bacher — and are worth your at­ten­tion.

Two bal­lot ques­tions give Ohio­ans the op­por­tu­nity to re­claim our state’s po­lit­i­cal pro­cess from pro­fes­sional pol­i­ti­cians and the spe­cial in­ter­ests they work for. Ap­proval of Is­sue 1 would au­tho­rize a con­ven­tion of cit­i­zens to ex­am­ine needed up­dates and changes to the state con­sti­tu­tion.

Is­sue 2 would take the task of draw­ing Ohio’s maps for U.S. House and Gen­eral As­sem­bly dis­tricts out of the hands of self-serv­ing pol­i­ti­cians and as­sign it to a non­par­ti­san panel of cit­i­zens. That would en­able vot­ers to pick their elected of­fi­cials, rather than the other way around. Both pro­pos­als merit your sup­port.

Over­come the urge to stop at Is­sue 2, de­spite its end­less word­ing on the bal­lot, cour­tesy of the Ohio Bal­lot Board. Vote yes on 2 and then move on: Plenty of vi­tal lo­cal is­sues and other con­tests also re­quire you to make cru­cial choices.

Vot­ers in Toledo and the rest of Lu­cas County face a raft of re­quests for prop­erty tax in­creases and re­new­als. The temp­ta­tion will be strong among many vot­ers to re­ject all of them with­out even ex­am­in­ing them in­di­vid­u­ally, but please re­sist it.

If you truly can’t af­ford an in­crease in your tax bill, that’s one thing. Oth­er­wise, is it worth sav­ing a cou­ple of bucks a week if that means a fam­ily af­flicted by child abuse or men­tal ill­ness or drug or al­co­hol ad­dic­tion won’t get the timely, ex­pert, po­ten­tially life-sav­ing help it needs? What if it were your fam­ily?

If you don’t have chil­dren in pub­lic school, does that mean that what hap­pens in Toledo Pub­lic Schools, or any of the other lo­cal dis­tricts that are seek­ing lev­ies, is ir­rel­e­vant to you? Think again: The qual­ity of pub­lic schools is among the key con­sid­er­ations for job-cre­at­ing em­ploy­ers when they de­cide whether to lo­cate and ex­pand here.

Would you pre­fer to see your neigh­bor­hood branch of the pub­lic li­brary, or Imag­i­na­tion Sta­tion, close rather than in­vest a mod­est amount to help keep them open? Do you want to see pub­lic parks in Toledo, or the Metroparks, be­come less safe, less clean, less well main­tained? It’s your call.

Vot­ers in Syl­va­nia and Spen­cer town­ships can, and should, re­ject the un­jus­ti­fied dis­man­tling of the Toledo Area Re­gional Tran­sit Au­thor­ity that their coun­ter­parts in Per­rys­burg started this year. This area needs an ef­fec­tive pub­lic trans­por­ta­tion sys­tem to re­main eco­nom­i­cally com­pet­i­tive, and to en­able our neigh­bors who don’t or can’t drive to get to the doc­tor’s of­fice, the gro­cery store, or the work­place. Com­mu­ni­ties try­ing to go it alone just won’t work.

Don’t for­get the con­tested elec­tions for the Ohio Supreme Court and Gen­eral As­sem­bly. The ac­tiv­i­ties of both the leg­is­la­tive and ju­di­cial branches of state gov­ern­ment af­fect Ohio­ans’ lives ev­ery day.

And how­ever dis­taste­ful the task may seem, vote for Lu­cas County of­fices — and re­solve to sup­port the kind of county gov­ern­ment re­form that would make these elec­tions com­pet­i­tive and mean­ing­ful.

If you live in Mich­i­gan, you’ve got im­por­tant con­tests for the U.S. Senate and state Supreme Court, just as Ohio­ans do. You’ve also got a half-dozen state­wide bal­lot pro­pos­als.

Above all, a no vote by Mich­i­ga­nians on Pro­posal 6 will ad­vance the pros­pects of a badly needed new bridge be­tween Detroit and Can­ada. No sin­gle proj­ect is more crit­i­cal to the eco­nomic de­vel­op­ment of this re­gion. An oc­to­ge­nar­ian bil­lion­aire shouldn’t be per­mit­ted to block such prog­ress merely to pre­serve his per­sonal bridge mo­nop­oly.

The same ty­coon is bank­roll­ing the equally nox­ious Pro­posal 5, which would re­quire a su­per-ma­jor­ity of the Leg­is­la­ture or a state­wide vote to ap­prove any tax in­crease. That would ham­per Mich­i­gan’s abil­ity to re­spond to a fis­cal cri­sis; vote no on this tur­key too.

The Blade’s sum­mary of its rec­om­men­da­tions ap­pears on the ad­ja­cent page, and will run again on Elec­tion Day. But as usual, the only en­dorse­ments that count are the ones you make on your bal­lot. As long as you’re vot­ing, you might as well do the whole job.

So make sure you vote — and earn your right to com­plain about the re­sults.

David Kushma is ed­i­tor of The Blade.

Con­tact him at: dkushma@the­

Click to comment

Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem?

Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis aut rerum necessitatibus saepe eveniet.

Copyright © 2018 Toledo Blade

To Top

Fetching stories…