THE Israelis and the Palestinians are close to arriving at what is a state of very dangerous gridlock in the obligatory relationship between them.
An element of the Palestinians - severely divided by American and Israeli insistence that the victory of Hamas in the January elections not be allowed to result in effective government in the Palestinian territories - has been seeking to achieve some degree of cooperation between Hamas and Fatah.
The conflict between the two major Palestinian parties has led to more violent elements among them to carry out such acts as the capture of a young Israeli soldier.
That act was unwise, even if the logic was understandable, given the high number of Palestinians held prisoner by the Israelis. The Israeli response to the perilous situation of the captive was predictable, even without agreeing to President George W. Bush's position that the Israeli reaction was one of legitimate self-defense.
The Israelis are continuing to shell Gaza, stating they will permit its inhabitants no sleep until the prisoner is released. In addition, Palestinian legislators and members of its cabinet have been arrested by the Israelis.
The Palestinians have demanded that some Palestinian prisoners held by the Israelis be freed as part of a deal for the release of the Israeli soldier. The Israelis say they don't deal on those terms, even though there are certainly precedents for exchanges of prisoners between the two sides.
There are more potential victims. The Palestinians might execute the Israeli soldier. The Israelis might expand from their current military incursions into Gaza into a full-scale invasion of the Palestinian enclave, with many more casualties to be incurred.
Basically an Israeli re-occupation of Gaza would be to reverse the decision and action of now ailing former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to hand the territory over to ostensible, at least symbolic, Palestinian rule, which potentially represented a step toward a separate Palestinian state.
The real danger in the current Israeli-Palestinian face-off is to the Middle East peace process.
At one time fully alive, with Mr. Bush an eloquent advocate of a settlement that would include two states, recognizing each other, living side by side, the peace process has now collapsed to the point that the two sides cannot even negotiate successfully the release of one Israeli soldier, for whatever the Israelis might offer in return.
It is difficult to imagine what the Israelis and the Palestinians believe there is to gain by not working through this relatively minor diplomatic problem without recourse to rockets, artillery, armor, and war planes.
Is it inconceivable that Mr. Bush might send one of his senior aides, Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, or Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, to show the two sides the way to a calm resolution of this issue and a resumption of the peace process?
Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. Comments that violate these standards, or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, are subject to being removed and commenters are subject to being banned. To post comments, you must be a registered user on toledoblade.com. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.