Loading…
Monday, July 28, 2014
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
Published: Wednesday, 4/6/2011

GUEST EDITORIAL

Cowardice on 9/11 trial

Last year, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder described a federal court trial for the self-professed mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, as "the defining event of my time as attorney general." This week, Mr. Holder's dream for demonstrating the power of the American court system crumbled.

Mr. Holder announced the trial would take place not in New York City or anywhere else in the United States, but before a military commission at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, prison camp. That retreat is a victory for congressional pandering and an embarrassment for the Obama Administration, which failed to stand up to it.

The wound inflicted on New York City from Mr. Mohammed's plot nearly a decade ago will not heal for many lifetimes. Yet the city, while still grieving, has thrived. How fitting it would have been to put the plot's architect on trial a few blocks from the site of the World Trade Center, to force him to submit to the justice of a dozen chosen New Yorkers, to show the world that we will not allow fear of terrorism to alter our rule of law.

But apparently, there are many who continue to cower. They view terrorists as much more fearsome than homegrown American mass murderers and the American civilian jury system as too "soft" to impose needed justice.

The administration of President George W. Bush encouraged this view for more than seven years. It spread a notion that terror suspects could only be safely held and tried far from our shores at Guantanamo and brought nowhere near an American courthouse.

Federal courts have convicted hundreds of terrorists since 9/11. Federal prisons safely hold more than 350.

The pandering toward this mentality began as soon as Mr. Holder announced his plan in 2009 to try Mr. Mohammed in Lower Manhattan. A group of senators, including Joseph Lieberman (I., Conn.), complained that it would give terrorists a platform to rally others to their cause. Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.), said the trial should be moved elsewhere because New Yorkers didn't want it -- as if prosecutors needed opinion polls to determine where to seek justice.

The final blow came from New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who originally accepted the trial but then gave in to downtown business interests that opposed it for reasons of inconvenience.

The mayor's office promulgated the absurd notion that security would cost $1 billion. Congress then made the trial impossible last year, with a measure prohibiting any spending to move prisoners from Guantanamo to the United States.

Mr. Holder was right to sound bitter about the decision at his news conference on Monday. But the Obama Administration must shoulder some of the blame.

As The New Yorker magazine reported last year, it did little to prepare the political groundwork for a local trial and barely defended the idea after the unfounded attacks began.

Under the circumstances, Mr. Holder is right to push for a military trial for Mr. Mohammed, rather than let him linger in indefinite limbo. His decision will test whether reforms to the military commission system will allow for both a fair prosecution and a vigorous defense.

But this week's announcement represents a huge missed opportunity to prove the fairness of the federal court system and restore the nation's reputation for providing justice for all.

-- New York Times



Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.

Related stories