Loading…
Friday, October 24, 2014
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
Published: Monday, 11/5/2012

EDITORIAL

Heat is on Congress

The first nine months of 2012 were the warm­est on record for the United States as a whole. Toledo’s first nine months were its warm­est in 58 years. They were the warm­est in 74 years in Cleve­land, in 65 years in Co­lum­bus and Cin­cin­nati, and in 54 years in Detroit.

An­ec­dotal or not, these and other records as­sem­bled by the Na­tional Cli­matic Data Center add to the over­whelm­ing body of ev­i­dence that Earth’s cli­mate is warm­ing. Some of the change is nat­u­ral; some is man-made. Plenty of symp­toms — from last week’s su­per-storm Sandy to record Arc­tic ice melts to Amer­ica’s worst drought in a half-cen­tury — sug­gest the need for a global re­sponse.

Four years ago, Re­pub­li­can pres­i­den­tial nom­i­nee John McCain de­clared cli­mate change a ma­jor con­cern of his cam­paign. This year, mem­bers of his party mock any pre­tense of mean­ing­ful dis­cus­sion of the is­sue.

Still, the next Con­gress needs to act. The pref­er­a­ble course is cap-and-trade leg­is­la­tion that would al­low in­dus­tries to bar­ter among them­selves for emis­sions cred­its, and thus main­tain flex­i­bil­ity in re­spond­ing to anti-pol­lu­tion man­dates.

Con­tin­ued in­dif­fer­ence to the is­sue of cli­mate change is a pre­scrip­tion for fail­ure. More than 100 sci­en­tists and pub­lic of­fi­cials im­plored Pres­i­dent Obama and GOP nom­i­nee Mitt Rom­ney to ad­dress the threat of ris­ing sea lev­els dur­ing their fi­nal de­bate last month, but the is­sue did not arise.

Res­i­dents of the Great Lakes re­gion may feel in­su­lated from any need to re­in­force South Flor­ida and Lou­i­si­ana coast­lines be­cause of higher sea lev­els. Yet the bil­lions of dol­lars it would cost to do this would af­fect all tax­pay­ers.

Mr. Obama ap­peared ready to make ma­jor in­roads on cli­mate change dur­ing his first two years in of­fice. Yet he has said too lit­tle about the mat­ter since the Re­pub­li­can victory in the 2010 elec­tion.

The U.S. En­vi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency has made up­dates to some pol­lu­tion con­trols, re­quir­ing util­i­ties to look to op­tions other than their most an­ti­quated coal-fired power plants. Much of the slack has been picked up by plants fu­eled by nat­u­ral gas — an im­prove­ment, yet still a fos­sil fuel with en­vi­ron­men­tal bag­gage.

Both na­tional se­cu­rity and price sta­bil­ity will re­quire the coun­try to de­velop a broader en­ergy mix, in­clud­ing greater re­li­ance on re­new­able sources. That in, turn, will re­quire the next Con­gress to get se­ri­ous about cli­mate change.



Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.

Related stories