Detroit's bankruptcy and the problems facing its pension funds offer two lessons to other communities. One is that state and local governments need to do a better job managing retirement funds. The other is that they should not pre-emptively reduce hard-earned benefits at the first sign of trouble.
Several state and local pension systems around the country are under serious stress. Not surprisingly, the hardest hit retirement funds are in places devastated by global economic forces such as Detroit, as well as inland cities in California such as Stockton, which was battered by the real estate collapse and has also sought bankruptcy protection.
Other troubled funds include state-employee and teacher retirement systems in Illinois and Connecticut, where government officials have long mismanaged public finances.
Officials repeatedly have failed to set aside enough money to cover the benefits they have promised workers, according to a recent report by Moody’s, the credit ratings firm. Some states and cities have compounded their problems by trying to compensate with risky bets, such as investing heavily in hedge funds — hardly surefire winners — in hopes of earning high returns. Or like Detroit, they borrowed money to sustain their pension systems without having a solid plan for repaying the new debt.
Avoiding a Detroit-like downward spiral requires discipline and intelligence. Most urgently, officials who oversee troubled funds need to save more money.
In some cases, they may have no choice but to reduce benefits. But that shouldn’t happen before other creditors are asked to take a haircut and before they consult with workers and retirees.
Most government retirement systems are in much better shape than critics suggest. Although many pension funds suffered losses during the financial crisis, they should be able to pay out benefits to retirees as long as governments keep funding them adequately and the economy continues to recover.
Some lawmakers suggest that cities and states reduce benefits for retirees or force them into riskier and more expensive retirement options, including annuities and 401(k) plans. That would be the wrong lesson to learn from Detroit.
All states and cities would do well to examine a promising approach to pension management recently adopted by the Canadian province of New Brunswick, with the support of labor unions.
The province’s approach splits benefits for retirees into two tiers: base and ancillary. The idea is to guarantee basic benefits and allow ancillary benefits (such as cost of living adjustments) to fluctuate based on the health of the pension fund.
If a fund’s investments fall too much, the government kicks in more money and retirees do not get some of the ancillary benefits. If it does better than expected, employers recoup some of their earlier contributions and workers get bigger monthly pension checks.
State and local officials have little control over the global economy. But they can do a lot to protect taxpayers and employees from financial disasters.
— New York Times
Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. Comments that violate these standards, or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, are subject to being removed and commenters are subject to being banned. To post comments, you must be a registered user on toledoblade.com. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.