Tuesday, October 06, 2015
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
Published: Wednesday, 10/31/2012 - Updated: 2 years ago

Bell, councilmen say $9M water park could be built through funds from recreation levy


Mayor Mike Bell and two coun­cil mem­bers pitched plans Tues­day for up to $9 mil­lion in new aquatic proj­ects to be funded through a rec­re­ation levy that goes be­fore voters next week.

Mr. Bell, joined by coun­cil­men Steven Steel and Lind­say Webb, urged vot­ers to sup­port Is­sue 5, a 10-year, 1-mill levy re­quest that would gen­er­ate about $3 mil­lion an­nu­ally to fund the park sys­tem, and, they said, build two wa­ter rec­re­ation sites.

Sup­port­ers trum­pet the pro­posed levy as a way to cre­ate a ded­i­cated fund­ing source for Toledo’s hard-hit rec­re­ation bud­get and build fa­cil­i­ties to serve res­i­dents of all ages. But oth­ers ques­tion the tim­ing while the city works to meet other needs.

“This par­tic­u­lar is­sue is so im­por­tant, just from the stand­point of we will be able to fo­cus on our kids and be able to also fo­cus on our adults,” said Mr. Bell, dur­ing a press con­fer­ence at One Govern­ment Center.

City of­fi­cials said lo­ca­tions have not been cho­sen for the two pro­posed fa­cil­i­ties. A wa­ter park with slides and wa­ter­fall fea­tures could be built in a cen­tral spot for about $6 mil­lion, said city spokes­man Jen Sor­gen­frei. A $2 mil­lion to $3 mil­lion pool for se­niors to do wa­ter aero­bics or swim laps in a “calmer en­vi­ron­ment” could be placed at or near a se­nior cen­ter, she said. The proj­ects are in line with com­mu­nity feed­back and mas­ter plan work, she said.

Rev­e­nue bonds, re­paid through the pro­posed rec­re­ation levy, would fund the proj­ects, Ms. Sor­gen­frei said. The city wouldn’t be­gin site plans or de­signs “un­til we know we have a se­cured rev­e­nue source,” she said.

Ms. Webb said the levy also would al­low the city to “con­sis­tently fund rec­re­ational op­por­tu­ni­ties” and en­hance ex­ist­ing infra­struc­ture.

Ms. Sor­gen­frei said the city would de­mol­ish some city pools in dis­re­pair and even­tu­ally con­vert those sites to other uses. The city would eval­u­ate which neigh­bor­hood pools would re­main open in ad­di­tion to the pro­posed wa­ter park.

The rec­re­ation levy comes be­fore vot­ers dur­ing a “very chal­leng­ing fi­nan­cial time,” said Coun­cil­man George Saran­tou.

He and coun­cil­men Tom Waniew­ski and Rob Lude­man voted against put­ting the re­quest on the bal­lot.

“In my per­sonal opin­ion, I be­lieve we need to di­rect as many dol­lars as we can to­ward pub­lic safety,” Mr. Saran­tou said.

He called the tim­ing of the proj­ect an­nounce­ments a “mar­ket­ing ploy” to give vot­ers a rea­son to sup­port the levy and said the fund­ing fo­cus should be on po­lice, fire, streets, and schools.

“Tax­pay­ers feel they are pay­ing enough in prop­erty taxes,” he said.

Mr. Waniew­ski said the levy hasn’t been ap­proved, and yet “we are al­ready spend­ing money we don’t have” with­out proper plan­ning.

“It fur­ther un­der­scores the po­lit­i­cal willy-nilly spend­ing that is gov­ern­ment,” he said.

Con­tact Va­nessa McCray at: vmc­cray@the­blade.com or 419-724-6065.

Recommended for You

Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.

Related stories