House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio arrives on Capitol Hill in Washington after a meeting at the White House between President Obama and Congressional leaders before billions of dollars in mandatory budget cuts were to start. The Friday meeting lasting less than an hour yielded no immediate results.
ASSOCIATED PRESS Enlarge
WASHINGTON — With federal budget cuts beginning to take effect, House Speaker John Boehner on Sunday reinforced his opposition to any deal to reverse the cuts that includes new revenues, but he and White House officials left open a narrow path to a comprehensive budget agreement that could restore at least some of the money.
Mr. Boehner, appearing on NBC’s Meet the Press, said President Obama has raised taxes nearly $1 trillion to finance his health-care program and in January won $650 billion in steeper taxes on high incomes.
“How much more does he want?” asked Mr. Boehner (R., Ohio). “When is the President going to address the spending side of this?”
But the speaker offered some hope that the budget process — which begins this week with likely House passage of a spending measure, or “continuing resolution,” to keep the government open for the rest of the year — could still end in a comprehensive agreement that lowers the deficit, overhauls the tax code, and restores at least some of the automatic spending cuts.
“I don’t think anyone quite understands how it gets resolved,” he conceded. “After we do our continuing resolution, we’ll begin to work on our budget. The House has done a budget every year that I’ve been speaker.
“The Senate hasn’t done a budget for four years. They’ve committed to do a budget this year. And I hope that they do. And out of that discussion and out of that process, maybe we can find a way to deal with our long-term spending problem.”
To that end, Mr. Obama made a round of phone calls to senators of both parties over the weekend to prod bipartisan deficit talks, Gene Sperling, director of the White House National Economic Council, said Sunday on Meet The Press.
It was not clear whom Mr. Obama had called.
Aides to several senators who have participated in groups or committees looking for a bipartisan deal said their offices did not receive such calls from the President. They include Sens. Richard J. Durbin, (D., Ill.); Mark R. Warner (D., Va.); Kelly Ayotte (R., N.H.); Susan Collins (R., Maine); Mike Johanns (R., Neb.), and John McCain (R., Ariz.).
The President’s path to a less arbitrary approach to deficit reduction is narrow and uphill, lawmakers of both parties say.
House Republican leaders are adamant that they want no changes to the tax code — including closing loopholes that both sides agree are wasteful — as part of a deal to undo the spending cuts.
Instead, they say that any closing of loopholes or changes to the tax code should be part of a comprehensive effort to simplify the tax code and lower tax rates but keep the level of revenue received by the government the same.
“Republicans want tax reform. We want to bring rates down for all Americans so that we’ve got a fairer tax code,” Mr. Boehner said. “But to arbitrarily pull out a couple of tax expenditures and to say, ‘Well, we ought to use that to get rid of the sequester.’ Listen, every American knows Washington has a spending problem.”
The Senate’s top two Republican leaders, Sens. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and John Cornyn of Texas, are increasingly reflecting that same position. Both fear a primary challenge from their right flank as they move toward re-election campaigns next year.
Mr. McConnell, appearing on CNN’s State of the Union, gave no indication that he was willing to undo the automatic cuts with new revenue, only with spending cuts in other parts of the budget.
“We think it’s important to the American people to keep this commitment. We’re willing to do it. We’re willing to talk about reconfiguring the same spending over the next several months,” he said.
The White House is left to hope that rank-and-file senators can build momentum for a bipartisan deficit deal that isolates Republican leaders and raises pressure that cannot be resisted.
“I have talked to a number of colleagues on both sides of the aisle, many of whom are disgusted with the current state of affairs,” Ms. Collins said.
She has begun work with Sen. Mark Udall (D., Colo.) on legislation to mitigate the effect of the across-the-board cuts by giving the Obama Administration more latitude to spread them around. She said those efforts could put lawmakers on a path toward a consensus on reversing the cuts.
But, she said, the President has to speak frankly to the public about the tough changes that are needed over the long term to Social Security and Medicare as the population ages and entitlement costs continue to rise.
It is not enough to keep repeating that Mr. Obama is prepared to compromise, she said.
“The President has to go first with plans for Medicare and Social Security,” she said. “Then I think you will see more receptivity on the Republican side to an overhaul of the tax code” that raises more revenue.
Ms. Ayotte said Sunday on the ABC’s This Week that she too would be open to more revenues in a broad, bipartisan deal that dealt with entitlements.
Mr. Sperling said Sunday that the speaker already had offered $1 trillion in additional revenue over 10 years in talks with the President in December. About $600 billion in tax increases took effect in January.