Loading…
Friday, July 25, 2014
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
Published: Monday, 11/12/2012 - Updated: 1 year ago

OPINION

India-Pakistan partition remains a political chasm

BY DR. S. AMJAD HUSSAIN
BLADE COLUMNIST

Before they granted In­dia its in­de­pen­dence in 1947, Brit­ish lead­ers di­vided the coun­try into ma­jor­ity Hindu In­dia and pre­dom­i­nantly Muslim Paki­stan. The par­ti­tion of In­dia was one of the ma­jor geo­po­lit­i­cal cat­a­clysms in his­tory.

In its im­me­di­ate af­ter­math, more than 1 mil­lion peo­ple were killed. An es­ti­mated 8 mil­lion — no one knows the ex­act num­ber — were forced to flee their cen­tu­ries-old an­ces­tral homes to the safety of newly drawn bor­ders.

Although most In­di­ans and Paki­stanis are too young to have ex­pe­ri­enced those fate­ful events, the nar­ra­tive of the par­ti­tion still res­o­nates with peo­ple in both coun­tries. Po­lit­i­cal and re­li­gious lead­ers as­sign blame for the car­nage to the other side.

In that hy­per-charged, par­a­noid cli­mate, writ­ers on both sides of the di­vide have looked at suf­fer­ing through the prism of hu­man­ity. To­day, a large body of par­ti­tion lit­er­a­ture in English, Urdu, and Hindi helps us see events be­yond clichés, la­bels, and par­ti­san self-righ­teous­ness.

One such writer was the late Saa­dat Has­san Manto. His short sto­ries, writ­ten in Urdu, pro­vide a hu­man face to im­per­sonal statis­tics of the par­ti­tion. He brought them to life in vivid and com­pel­ling prose.

Aye­sha Jalal, an ex­pert on the par­ti­tion, di­rects the Center for South Asian and In­dian Ocean Studies at Tufts Univer­sity in Boston. She has pub­lished a num­ber of schol­arly books on the par­ti­tion.

In a re­cent pub­lic lec­ture at the Univer­sity of Toledo, Ms. Jalal ex­plored the par­ti­tion through Mr. Manto’s short sto­ries. She used the im­ag­ery cre­ated by Mr. Manto to un­der­score the enor­mous hu­man trag­edy that the par­ti­tion brought in its wake.

In a story ti­tled Khol Do (“Open Up”), a gang-rape vic­tim, miss­ing for days, is dis­cov­ered by her father in a hos­pi­tal. The girl is in a daze and barely breath­ing.

To get more air in the room, the doc­tor points to the win­dow and says: “Open up.” The girl stirs, reaches for the draw­string of her pa­jama bot­toms, and pulls them down. Thou­sands of sim­i­lar other sto­ries were scat­tered in the de­bris of the up­heaval.

In­dia and Paki­stan have fought three wars sin­ce1947. Rela­tions be­tween the two coun­tries have had their ups and downs.

Yet there has not been a uni­fied ef­fort by both coun­tries to con­front the demons of the par­ti­tion and come to terms with each other’s ex­is­tence. Sur­pris­ingly, there still is a ground­swell of good­will be­tween peo­ple on both sides.

There is talk of more trade, re­laxed visa pol­i­cies, and ex­change vis­its. But noth­ing much comes out of it.

The peo­ple of In­dia and Paki­stan have much more that unites them than that di­vides them. In ad­di­tion to a mil­len­nium-old his­tory, they share mu­sic, arts, food, and cul­tural tra­di­tions.

Per­haps they should con­sider some­thing in the spirit of the Truth and Rec­on­cil­i­a­tion Com­mis­sion of South Africa. In­dia and Paki­stan could ask each other for for­give­ness.

One of Mr. Manto’s short sto­ries re­volves around a man in a men­tal asy­lum who is sent to In­dia be­cause he is a Sikh. The man does not com­pre­hend the sea change around him. He dies sprawl­ing across the no-man’s-land at the cross­ing be­tween In­dia and Paki­stan.

On a sab­bati­cal in Am­rit­sar, In­dia, some years ago, I was in­vited to speak to the Rotary Club. I spoke about par­ti­tion. I sug­gested we should erect a mon­u­ment where Toba Tek Singh, the char­ac­ter in Mr. Manto’s story, died.

It should show a Muslim, a Hindu, and a Sikh stand­ing with their heads bowed in shame. The in­scrip­tion would read: We are ashamed of what we did to each other at the time of the par­ti­tion. An art­ist friend of mine later pro­vided an il­lus­tra­tion.

Despite a friendly au­di­ence, my sug­ges­tion was re­ceived in to­tal si­lence. We have a lot more work to do.

Dr. S. Am­jad Hus­sain is a re­tired Toledo sur­geon whose col­umn ap­pears ev­ery other week in The Blade.

Con­tact him at: aghaji@bex.net

This illustration of a suggested monument has, from left, a Hindu, a Sikh, and a Muslim with an inscription: ‘We are ashamed of what we did to each other at the time of the Partition.' This illustration of a suggested monument has, from left, a Hindu, a Sikh, and a Muslim with an inscription: ‘We are ashamed of what we did to each other at the time of the Partition.'
DRAWING BY MUHAMMAD ZAHOOR Enlarge



Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.

Related stories