Loading…
Sunday, December 28, 2014
Current Weather
Loading Current Weather....
HomeNewsState
Published: Tuesday, 5/8/2012 - Updated: 2 years ago

Ohio Republicans vote to repeal election reform law

BY JIM PROVANCE
BLADE COLUMBUS BUREAU CHIEF

COLUMBUS — An attempt to broker a compromise having failed, Ohio House Republicans today took the unprecedented step of repealing a controversial election reform law that had already qualified for a November voter referendum.

“There’s no reason to go ahead with the election,” said Rep. Louis Blessing (R., Cincinnati). “We can save the taxpayers at least $1 million.”

The courts are likely to be the final arbiter as to whether the legislative repeal of House Bill 194 can yank from the ballot a certified voter referendum championed largely by Democrats and backed by President Obama’s re-election campaign.

“There’s nothing this General Assembly can do to stop this,” Rep. Dennis Murray (D., Sandusky) said. “What we’re doing is asking the people of this state to cast a meaningless vote…If they get enough signatures to get it on the ballot, we’ll just take it off so they don’t get a chance to express their ire…We discourage people in the future from taking advantage of their initiative and referendum right.”

The House voted 54-42 with three Republicans—Reps. Kristina Roegner (R., Hudson), Jarrod Martin (R., Beavercreek), and Jim Butler (R., Oakwood) — joining all Democrats in opposition. The bill now goes to Gov. John Kasich, who supports the repeal.

The fight has placed Republicans in the awkward position of using only their votes to repeal a law that they passed only with their votes. It placed Democrats in an equally awkward position of fighting to prevent the legislative repeal of a law they argued would disenfranchise elderly, minority, and urban voters who might be more inclined to vote for Democrats.

Republicans argued that a repeal now would give Democrats exactly what they would have if the referendum is successful on Nov. 6. But Democrats countered that the repeal would not be complete because a portion of House Bill 194 had been inserted into a separate law that was not subjected to a referendum petition effort.

That provision prohibits in-person early voting on the three days immediately preceding the election. The committee behind the referendum effort made restoration of those early-voting days a condition of their support to voluntarily pull the question from the ballot.

“This does not put the law back to the way it was,” House Minority Leader Armond Budish (D., Beachwood) said.

Among its many provisions, House Bill 194 would reduce the windows for absentee and early voting, prohibit counties from mass mailing absentee ballot applications to all registered voters, and eliminate the so-called “Golden Week,” a five-day period in which would-be voters could register to vote and then immediately cast an absentee ballot.

It also creates statewide standards for the counting of last-resort provisional ballots and drops a requirement that a poll worker direct someone standing in the wrong line in a multi-precinct voting place to the right line instead of simply handing him a provisional ballot that likely won’t be counted.



Guidelines: Please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. If a comment violates these standards or our privacy statement or visitor's agreement, click the "X" in the upper right corner of the comment box to report abuse. To post comments, you must be a Facebook member. To find out more, please visit the FAQ.

Related stories









Poll