Monday, Jun 18, 2018
One of America's Great Newspapers ~ Toledo, Ohio

Tom Walton

Some explanations of evil will never be found

News me­dia cov­er­age of the mass mur­ders at the movie the­ater in Aurora, Colo., in July was ter­ri­bly fa­mil­iar. Twelve peo­ple were killed and doz­ens more were in­jured, al­leg­edly by a weirdo whose con­cept of ra­tio­nal be­hav­ior dif­fers rad­i­cally from yours or mine. 

Shortly there­af­ter, the fu­ner­als started, and news re­ports said the fam­i­lies were gath­er­ing “to make sense of the trag­edy.”

Some months ear­lier, four sib­lings were killed in a shoot­ing ram­page in Texas, and the shooter — the hus­band and brother-in-law of the vic­tims — then killed him­self. 

Hun­dreds of friends and fam­ily at­tended a me­mo­rial ser­vice in an at­tempt, the story said — wait for it — “to make sense of the trag­edy.”

How many times have we read about a mass ho­mi­cide or a fam­ily dis­pute that ends in mul­ti­ple deaths, of­ten fol­lowed by the sui­cide of the per­pe­tra­tor? 

It’s a trag­edy be­yond be­lief for most of us, yet we are told that sur­viv­ing rel­a­tives have gath­ered to make sense of it all.

Make sense of it? 

The shooter, it is usu­ally ex­plained, re­ally didn’t like his in-laws, or his co-work­ers, or in the Texas case his ex-wife and her sis­ters and brother, and was des­per­ate for a way out of a bad sit­u­a­tion.

Oh, that ex­plains it. Yeah, now it makes sense. The fam­ily feels so much bet­ter, right?

No, I’m sorry. There is noth­ing about it that makes sense, so let’s quit say­ing it. 

Fam­ily mem­bers are gath­er­ing to mourn their dev­as­tat­ing loss, not to find jus­ti­fi­ca­tion col­lec­tively.

As we slog through the mud to­ward the fin­ish line of yet an­other elec­tion sea­son (are we ever re­ally out of elec­tion sea­son?), an old and fa­mil­iar lament of mine re­sur­faces: lack of brev­ity. 

Pol­i­ti­cians never use one word when 10 will do. So of­ten they have noth­ing to say and take an hour to say it.

It’s the same with those of us who earn our keep by com­ment­ing on pol­i­ti­cians and of­fer­ing our opin­ions. 

Syn­di­cated col­um­nists are guilty of it. The talk­ing heads on tele­vi­sion are guilty of it. I’m guilty of it.

So I was sin­gu­larly im­pressed by one can­di­date’s per­for­mance a few years ago, when I served as mas­ter of cer­e­mo­nies for a tele­vised pre-elec­tion de­bate at WGTE-TV.

Some two dozen lo­cal can­di­dates showed up be­fore dawn for the live 90-minute event, spon­sored by the Toledo Re­gional Cham­ber of Com­merce.

Be­cause the turn­out of can­di­dates was so good, most of them shared the plat­form with their op­po­nent. So at one point I asked each of them in turn to de­scribe his or her op­po­nent in just two words.

Down one row and then the next came the care­ful re­sponses: “pleas­ant fel­low,” “nice look­ing,” “good friend,” that sort of thing. 

Then we came to a can­di­date who leaned into his mi­cro­phone, glanced at the empty chair next to him, and said sim­ply: “Not here.”

I wish I could re­mem­ber who the clever can­di­date was. I hope he won.

Some­body should tell the peo­ple who mea­sure out spaces in those big park­ing ga­rages that they need to make the spaces a lit­tle wider.

I had oc­ca­sion to visit the big park­ing struc­ture at Toledo Hos­pi­tal re­cently. Although there were sev­eral open spaces, I couldn’t fit my small car into any of them.

The rea­son: Every avail­able space was squeezed on both sides by gi­ant SUVs. I found one I man­aged to slide into, but I couldn’t open my door to get out. So I care­fully backed out, man­aged to avoid scrap­ing their doors with my mir­rors, and re­sumed my search. 

By the time I found a spot I could use, I was late for my ap­point­ment.

Noth­ing against SUVs per se. They do pro­vide a feel­ing of safety and pro­tec­tion. If peo­ple can af­ford the gas­o­line, more power to them.

But in fair­ness, nar­row park­ing places in struc­tures and sur­face lots are only part of the prob­lem. 

Some of the driv­ers of these big Es­ca­lades and Nav­i­ga­tors need to prac­tice park­ing be­tween the lines.

Sorry about the rant.

People have been ask­ing whether there will be a “cli­ches, part 3” col­umn any time soon. 

I’m afraid that ship has sailed. Or per­haps that train has left the sta­tion.

Either way, it’s off the ta­ble, if you catch my drift. No Part 3 is loom­ing on the ho­ri­zon, so let’s just let sleep­ing dogs lie.

On the other hand, it ain’t over ’til it’s over. I never say never.

Tho­mas Wal­ton is the re­tired ed­i­tor and vice pres­i­dent of The Blade. His col­umn ap­pears ev­ery other Mon­day.

Con­tact him at:


Click to comment

Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem?

Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis aut rerum necessitatibus saepe eveniet.

Copyright © 2018 Toledo Blade

To Top

Fetching stories…